Biscuit, the neighbors’ new dog, should be taken to dog training school. Training school teaches dogs simple commands such as sit and stay, as well as how to walk on a leash and not pee on the carpet. The neighbors have been complaining that Biscuit is a nuisance, pees everywhere, and does not listen. Their older dog, Gravy, went to dog training school and is now very well behaved.
Which one of the following most accurately expresses the main conclusion of the argument?
A. Biscuit should be taken to dog training school.
B. Training school teaches dogs simple commands such as sit and stay.
C. The neighbors have been complaining about Biscuit.
D. Gravy went to dog training school.
E. Gravy is better behaved than Biscuit is.
Answer
CORRECT ANSWER: A
EXPLANATION: The first sentence is the main conclusion of the argument. Everything that follows is offered as support for why Biscuit should be taken to dog training school.
EXPLANATION: The first sentence is the main conclusion of the argument. Everything that follows is offered as support for why Biscuit should be taken to dog training school.
Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!
Related Post
Search the Blog
Free LSAT Practice Account
Sign up for a free Blueprint LSAT account and get access to a free trial of the Self-Paced Course and a free practice LSAT with a detailed score report, mind-blowing analytics, and explanatory videos.
Learn More
Popular Posts
-
-
-
-
General LSAT Advice How to Get a 180 on the LSAT -
Entertainment Revisiting Elle's LSAT Journey from Legally Blonde
Submit a Comment