Identify the flaw in the argument: “Every time I play darts, I hit the same spot on the board. Thus, I am good at darts.”
Answer
This is an equivocation fallacy. One version of the equivocation fallacy occurs when you treat two distinct concepts as though they are the same. Precision (hitting the same spot) is certainly related to accuracy (being good at darts), but they are distinct. So, it is not okay for an author to treat a premise about precision as though it proves a conclusion about accuracy.
Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!
Related Post
Search the Blog
Popular Posts
-
-
-
-
General LSAT Advice Two Truths About Retaking -
General LSAT Advice Understanding Your LSAT Score: The "Curve," Explained -
General LSAT Advice How is an LSAT score calculated? -
Free LSAT Practice Account
Take a free practice LSAT, get a detailed score report and explanatory videos, and learn your odds of getting into your dream school just by checking out our FREE LSAT resources.
Learn More
Submit a Comment