Identify the flaw in the argument: “Shawna is not a serious academic; she spends all of her time listening to pop music and only reads one book per week. So, we should not believe the results of her research.”
Answer
This is an ad hominem flaw. Shawna may know how to have fun and maybe that even makes her unserious. But even if it does, we cannot use her lack of seriousness to prove that her research is unreliable. It is never okay to use a personal attack on someone to justify a conclusion about claims that person makes.
Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!
Related Post
Search the Blog
Popular Posts
-
-
-
-
General LSAT Advice Two Truths About Retaking -
General LSAT Advice Understanding Your LSAT Score: The "Curve," Explained -
General LSAT Advice How is an LSAT score calculated? -
Free LSAT Practice Account
Take a free practice LSAT, get a detailed score report and explanatory videos, and learn your odds of getting into your dream school just by checking out our FREE LSAT resources.
Learn More
Submit a Comment