Scientist: Studies show that a sharp decrease in the bird population on a nearby island coincided with the first arrival of cruise ships to that island. So it is clear in this case that the arrival of cruise ships caused the sharp decrease in the bird population.
The reasoning in the scientist’s argument is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
A. Presumes, without providing justification, that a sharp decrease in the bird population is detrimental
B. Draws a general conclusion based on a sample that is likely to be unrepresentative
C. Inappropriately generalizes from facts about a specific period of time to a universal claim
D. Infers, merely from a claim that two events are associated, that one event causes the other
E. Takes for granted that the method used for gathering the data was reliable
Answer
CORRECT ANSWER = (D)
EXPLANATION: Causal flaw. Correlation does not equal causation.
Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!
Related Post
Search the Blog
Popular Posts
-
-
-
-
General LSAT Advice Two Truths About Retaking -
General LSAT Advice Understanding Your LSAT Score: The "Curve," Explained -
General LSAT Advice How is an LSAT score calculated? -
Free LSAT Practice Account
Take a free practice LSAT, get a detailed score report and explanatory videos, and learn your odds of getting into your dream school just by checking out our FREE LSAT resources.
Learn More
Submit a Comment