Identify the flaw in the argument: “The school board is very inefficient. Therefore, each of its members must be inefficient.”
Answer
This is a whole-to-part compositional fallacy. Remember that something as a whole is different from each of its constituent parts. So, a premise about something as a whole cannot support a conclusion about one or all of its parts.
Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!
Related Post
Search the Blog
Popular Posts
-
-
-
-
General LSAT Advice Two Truths About Retaking -
General LSAT Advice Understanding Your LSAT Score: The "Curve," Explained -
General LSAT Advice How is an LSAT score calculated? -
Free LSAT Practice Account
Take a free practice LSAT, get a detailed score report and explanatory videos, and learn your odds of getting into your dream school just by checking out our FREE LSAT resources.
Learn More
Submit a Comment