It has not been scientifically proven that ghosts do not exist. Furthermore, since there have been several failed attempts to produce such a proof, whether through scientific experiments or through close observation, one must conclude that ghosts are in fact real.
The reasoning is most vulnerable to criticism on the grounds that the argument
A. Takes for granted that the number of unsuccessful attempts to prove a claim is the only factor relevant to whether one should accept that claim.
B. Overlooks the possibility that some of the scientific experiments mentioned reached inaccurate conclusions
C. Takes for granted that the fact that a claim has not been demonstrated to be false establishes that it is true
D. Takes for granted that there is no scientific way to determine whether ghosts are real or not
E. Overlooks the possibility that the scientific experiments were poorly conducted
EXPLANATION: Absence of evidence is not evidence of absence.
Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!
Search the Blog
Free LSAT Practice Account
Sign up for a free Blueprint LSAT account and get access to a free trial of the Self-Paced Course and a free practice LSAT with a detailed score report, mind-blowing analytics, and explanatory videos.Learn More
logic games Game Over: LSAC Says Farewell to Logic Games
General LSAT Advice How to Get a 180 on the LSAT
Entertainment Revisiting Elle's LSAT Journey from Legally Blonde