Return to Blog Homepage

Flaw Practice – Passing the Bar

Identify the flaw in the argument: “In order to be a good lawyer, it is essential to pass the bar. Since Michael passed the bar, he must be a good lawyer.”

Answer

This is the fallacy of the converse.  Anytime you get a conditional statement, it’s important to make sure that the author of the argument uses the conditional statement correctly.  Here, the author uses it backwards.  Just because Michael has satisfied one requirement for being a good lawyer does not mean that he will definitely become one.  After all, there may be tons of other requirements beyond just passing the bar.

Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!


Related Post

Submit a Comment

Submit a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Search the Blog

Free LSAT Practice Account

Sign up for a free Blueprint LSAT account and get access to a free trial of the Self-Paced Course and a free practice LSAT with a detailed score report, mind-blowing analytics, and explanatory videos.

Learn More

Popular Posts