Identify the flaw in the argument: “In order to be a good lawyer, it is essential to pass the bar. Since Michael passed the bar, he must be a good lawyer.”
Answer
This is the fallacy of the converse. Anytime you get a conditional statement, it’s important to make sure that the author of the argument uses the conditional statement correctly. Here, the author uses it backwards. Just because Michael has satisfied one requirement for being a good lawyer does not mean that he will definitely become one. After all, there may be tons of other requirements beyond just passing the bar.
Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!
Related Post
Search the Blog
Free LSAT Practice Account
Sign up for a free Blueprint LSAT account and get access to a free trial of the Self-Paced Course and a free practice LSAT with a detailed score report, mind-blowing analytics, and explanatory videos.
Learn More
Popular Posts
-
-
-
-
General LSAT Advice How to Get a 180 on the LSAT -
Entertainment Revisiting Elle's LSAT Journey from Legally Blonde