Identify the flaw in the argument: “In order to be a good lawyer, it is essential to pass the bar. Since Michael passed the bar, he must be a good lawyer.”
Answer
This is the fallacy of the converse. Anytime you get a conditional statement, it’s important to make sure that the author of the argument uses the conditional statement correctly. Here, the author uses it backwards. Just because Michael has satisfied one requirement for being a good lawyer does not mean that he will definitely become one. After all, there may be tons of other requirements beyond just passing the bar.
Want to receive daily LSAT practice delivered right into your inbox? Sign up here for our LSAT Question of the Day emails!
Related Post
Search the Blog
Popular Posts
-
-
-
-
General LSAT Advice Two Truths About Retaking -
General LSAT Advice Understanding Your LSAT Score: The "Curve," Explained -
General LSAT Advice How is an LSAT score calculated? -
Free LSAT Practice Account
Take a free practice LSAT, get a detailed score report and explanatory videos, and learn your odds of getting into your dream school just by checking out our FREE LSAT resources.
Learn More
Submit a Comment